However, this may in some people's opinion be a little controversial to say as they may choose to disagree of have a conflicting opinion.
I feel that Al Gore made some strong points and had a very convincing argument. I feel that he was pro-Climate Change and clearly demonstrated this. I think he has had a real wake-up call and realised it is a problem, something does need to be done about it and he is now trying to do things to make a differance. As for my opinion, I feel that he did partly represent my opinion although I do not agree with everything he said. He had good sources of data and in the film it looked like he was talking about the truth for the majority, but i do think he could have at least tried to do more.
With regard to other people's opinion, i feel that he did take most opinions into account when he was making the film, however i think that was fairly vague.
I do feel that people's opinion to Climate Change could definately have been influenced from watching that film, which is partly why it was very controversial when it was first released in 2007. Climate change is definately an issue and is going to have an impact at some point through time; whether it is in our lifetime, our children's life time, our grandchildren's lifetime or whenever it happens, it will have an impact somewhere. When this happens, things will change. Although not necessarily the way they are being predicted to. Perhaps Al Gore was right and his data is correct and if it is then we have got a problem and something needs to be done. Conversely if he is not, then it may be all a big fuss over nothing. Eitherway there will always be people who will say something against what people try to do to change things. I think the film has had an influence on me and I feel like i have been partly manipulated into thinking more about Climate Change being real from watching the film. Although I am still a little unconvinced because we are not supposed to believe everything we hear.
I thought the film was very good, very informative and conveyed a lot of information and opinions, however after watching it for a while i did get a little distracted and started getting bored. This was because the film went a little off topic and began to focus on Al Gore's near Presidental election. This is not what i would have wanted to watch the film to see if i was watching it at home. I would have wanted to see and hear about how much Climate Change is going to have an impact upon our lives and what we as individuals as well as countries and globally to change or at least try to help prevent Climate Change from happening.
I do feel that people's opinion to Climate Change could definately have been influenced from watching that film, which is partly why it was very controversial when it was first released in 2007. Climate change is definately an issue and is going to have an impact at some point through time; whether it is in our lifetime, our children's life time, our grandchildren's lifetime or whenever it happens, it will have an impact somewhere. When this happens, things will change. Although not necessarily the way they are being predicted to. Perhaps Al Gore was right and his data is correct and if it is then we have got a problem and something needs to be done. Conversely if he is not, then it may be all a big fuss over nothing. Eitherway there will always be people who will say something against what people try to do to change things. I think the film has had an influence on me and I feel like i have been partly manipulated into thinking more about Climate Change being real from watching the film. Although I am still a little unconvinced because we are not supposed to believe everything we hear.
I thought the film was very good, very informative and conveyed a lot of information and opinions, however after watching it for a while i did get a little distracted and started getting bored. This was because the film went a little off topic and began to focus on Al Gore's near Presidental election. This is not what i would have wanted to watch the film to see if i was watching it at home. I would have wanted to see and hear about how much Climate Change is going to have an impact upon our lives and what we as individuals as well as countries and globally to change or at least try to help prevent Climate Change from happening.
I thought that the film was quite effective in telling the viewer about Climate Change, although i am not sure that it could have changed the opinion of a "Sceptic" it may have only opened their eyes. Climate change is a big issue to try to explain although i think that Al Gore did well to attempt it. Overall was the film effective? I think that the film was effective because it was able to get people engaged with the topic, to think about it and if nothing-else to talk about it. Afterall it is often through talking that the best ideas are achieved.
"Climate change is one of the greatest threats for the planet" David King (2004)
The image to the left shows an image of how or rather what Planet Earth may potentially look like after Global Warming has taken hold of the little (normally) 'Blue Planet' which we call home.
So now we all need to ask ourselves, and equally importantly eachother...
... Is Global Warming an issue?
This site has news about Climate Change and attempts to dispel the anthropogenic global warming hypotesis.
This site has news about Climate Change and attempts to dispel the anthropogenic global warming hypotesis.
If you want to put a stop to Global Warming..
This is a website where people are uniting to encourage politicians and govenment to take action to stop the effects of climate change.
For more information see the above link (stopglobalwarming.org)
To Join the 1,323,258 people already on the march click here
To Join the 1,323,258 people already on the march click here
The image below is the spectacular “blue marble” image and is the most detailed true-color image of the entire Earth to date. Using a collection of satellite-based observations, scientists and visualizers stitched together months of observations of the land surface, oceans, sea ice, and clouds into a seamless, true-color mosaic of every square kilometer (.386 square mile) of our planet. These images are freely available to educators, scientists, museums, and the public. This record includes preview images and links to full resolution versions up to 21,600 pixels across. (see "http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view_rec.php?id=2429" for more information).This image shows a fairly accurate depiction of how Planet Earth should look, although if we continue to burn fossil fuels, and emmit unsustainable amounts of polluting gases e.g CO2, Methane, Nitrous Oxide and Fluorocarbons into our atmosphere I don't think that our beautiful 'Blue Marble' is going to stay beautiful for much longer and may become more like the image nearer the middle of this page ('Red Earth') as a potential result of what I am going to refer to as Run-away Global Warming, which is simply when Global Warming has had such an impact upon the Earth is has passed the point of no return.
Just before you go, please take a quick look at the 2 images below, these are from ("http://veimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/1438/earth_lights_lrg.jpg") and ("http://soils.usda.gov/use/worldsoils/mapindex/popden.jpg") the first shows the light pollution from different countries around the world . The second image shows global population density in 1994. Although there is a gap of a few years between the images being created, there is a clear connection between them. If you compare the image displaying the light pollution with the population density map there is a corrolation that where there is a higher density population there is a larger amount of light pollution.